Category Archives: Investing

The Patriots Are Not the Greatest

By Larry Luxenberg  

The New England Patriots may very well be the greatest pro football dynasty of all time but one area where they don’t excel is in their impact on the stock market.

A Super Bowl Indicator developed decades ago holds that if an American Football Conference team wins the Super Bowl, the stock market will decline that calendar year. If a National Football Conference team or former NFL team, wins, the stock market will go up.

Despite this indicator having no actual basis in anything that should influence investor behavior or actual stock market returns, it has been surprisingly accurate in the half century since the first Super Bowl. In fact, it’s worked nearly 80 percent of the time or 4 out of 5 years. You’ll be hard pressed to find a more accurate stock market indicator.

As an AFC team, the Pats are bad for the stock market. But they have also been bad for the indicator, accounting for nearly half of the misses. Overall, though, the Pats haven’t busted the indicator but they have been mediocre for the market. In the five times before this year that the Pats won the Super Bowl, the market has gone up four times. But the one year it went down, 2002, lowered the overall average return to +3.38 for the S&P 500. While that’s a positive return, it’s still less than half of the S&P’s average return of 10 percent over the close to century for which we have accurate returns.

Surprisingly, in the years when the Pats lost, the market has averaged an even lower return of +2.01 percent. Two years have really hurt their returns. In 2008, when the Pats lost to the Giants by 17-14 in Arizona, the market dropped 37 percent. In a wining Pats year, 2002, the market dropped 22.1 percent after the Pats beat the then St. Louis Rams 20-17.

Excluding the two big losing years, the market has returned an above average 11.05 in the eight other years the Pats have appeared in the big game.

The conclusion for this year: the market is already off to a good start but may go up or down for reasons that are far removed from Brady and Belichick. While all of this may seem overly whimsical when big money and people’s lives are at stake, most American market participants do take their pro football seriously. And while there is no reason to assign any cause and effect to the Super Bowl Indicator, people move billions of dollars every day on flimsier evidence than this.

Share

A Great Casino

By Larry Luxenberg  

After one of the worst endings to a year in stock market history, it’s easy to despair and bash the market. When the stock market is collapsing, it’s hard to take the long view and be optimistic. But if you do, you’ll soon realize that the U.S. stock market is generally a friend to investors.

We have good data on the U.S. stock market since 1926. For those 92 years, including 2018, the stock market has been negative for a calendar year only 25 times. That’s using the Standard and Poor’s 500 as a measure for the stock market and including dividends. Of those 25 negative years, 15 years, including 2018, had losses of 10 percent or less. In 6 of those years, the market declined by less than 5 percent. In only 3 of the 92 years has the S&P declined by 30 percent or more. Only 4 times has the market declined for a second consecutive year.

The 4 bad times — with two or more consecutive years of losses — were during the Great Depression (1929 to 1932), the start of World War II (1939-41), the deep recession in the 70s after the Arab Oil Embargo and Watergate (1973-74) and the recession and tech collapse around 9/11 (2000 to 2002).

Other than those 4 times, the broad market has never had two or more straight declines. Of the 92 years, we’ve had 67 positive years or 73 percent of the time.

Following the most recent financial crisis, in 2009, after the Great Recession, the year started terribly, down more than 20 percent in the first few months but ended up by 26.5 percent. In 1987 following the crash that included the single worst day in U.S. stock market history, the market closed the year up by 5.2 percent.

Most people think of the stock market as a casino. But if you are a long-term investor, over the last century, you are the house and 3 out of 4 years, you are a winner, often by a large amount. I like those odds. Over the course of my 36 year investment career, the Dow Jones Industrial Average has gone from 800 to more than 23,000 as of year-end 2018. If you ask me, that’s a great casino and no cause for alarm just because of the recent unpleasantness.

 

Share

Paying for a Child’s Retirement for the Price of a Car

By Larry Luxenberg  

One of the best presents you can give a child is to fund their retirement. And it costs about the same as a modest car. The key to the gift is time. Having a long time to invest is critical but it costs you nothing but patience.

First let me explain how this works and then the four ways it could go wrong.

The initial step is to fund a Roth IRA. A child must have earned income but you can contribute an equivalent sum up to $5,500 a year to the child’s Roth. A Roth provides no deduction on the way in but if you hold it until age 59 1/2, there’s no tax on the way out. A $5,000 contribution to a Roth at age 20 and invested 100 percent in a diversified stock fund, earning the long-term return of stocks, would be worth $587,000 at age 70.

This sounds too easy so what could go wrong?

First, Congress could change the law so that the withdrawal would be taxed.

Secondly, inflation could eat up some or all of the returns. At the 3 percent inflation which has been the U.S. average in recent years, inflation would drive down the purchasing power by a third. Still, it would be a nice bundle to have in retirement.

Third, stocks could have disappointing returns. The longer one owns a diversified fund of stocks, the more likely that returns will be good but there are no guarantees in the stock market.

Finally, the child could mess things up in a variety of ways: invade the account early, change the investing approach or some other, unanticipated way.

Still, for the price of a regular car or less than a full semester at a good college, a parent could prepay a child’s entire retirement. An interesting idea and one I believe in strongly enough to try it.

 

Share

Good News for Investors

By Larry Luxenberg  

Recently, economic columnist Robert Samuelson wrote a column explaining why so many ordinary Americans perceive their situations as terrible despite what is frequently described as a great economy with record low unemployment.

His argument is that these workers are comparing their situations — lack of raises. a struggle to support their families and to get ahead — with that of a recent golden era. Samuelson maintains that the previous golden era was the result of unrepeatable forces.

This may not seem like good news for investors but their fortunes are not closely tied to workers. The long sluggish recovery that has lasted nearly 10 years is better for investors than the boom/bust of earlier, more robust recoveries with stronger growth but more frequent recessions. Often, what’s good for workers is also good for investors but not always and this may be one of those cases.

What economists at Pimco have termed “The New Normal” may leave workers pining for a bygone era but investors may applaud. Investors have been fretting that the Great Bull Market that began in August, 1982 and carried the Dow Jones Industrial Average to 10,000 in the late 1990s before resuming in March, 2009, may be nearing its end.

Instead, despite trade wars and unraveling of international alliances and general disquiet and upheavel, the long-term picture for investors might remain bright.https://wapo.st/2mClCV4?tid=ss_mail&utm_term=.5a152b7d96be

Share

The Danger of Market Timing

By Larry Luxenberg  

The Three Dangerous Times

The three particularly dangerous times for investors: when markets go up, when they go down and when they are flat.

For the last two years, U.S. markets have been in a narrow trading range. Some days the market is up a lot, some days it’s down big. But overall, for two years the broad market is close to flat — up 3 percent a year — a third of the long-term average.

During a long flat period, investors get bored and are often up to mischief, searching for alternatives that promise much and mask danger.

In bear markets — the market often plunges quickly –and  investors are prone to panic and do things that imperil their finances for many years.

When the market is doing well — bull markets — people get exuberant and overconfident and may take on greater risks and obligations than they intend. This sets them up for failure in the next cycle.

Given this bleak picture, what should investors do to improve their odds of success? Investors need to be patient, avoid emotional decisions and think long-term.

None of this is easy but it’s important for a successful investment experience.

Share

The Sun Will Shine Again

By Larry Luxenberg  

The U.S. stock market is off to its worst start ever — down nearly 12 percent in just three weeks. Standard & Poors searched records back to 1897 and couldn’t find anything worse.

While the market has been drifting lower since summer — including a brief but scary decline in late August — this drop has seemingly come out of nowhere and is unremitting in its furor.

Yesterday, the Dow dropped 550 points by midday before rallying sharply. While there are always things to worry about, this seems to be the bear market about nothing.

The Chinese economy, the second largest in the world, may be getting unhinged. And the oil market has gone from boom to busted in 18 months but hey, nobody’s perfect.

If it weren’t for these minor issues, the outlook might seem bright. Job growth has been strong in the U.S. and corporate balance sheets are in the best shape in years.

Worldwide, corporations and investors are awash in cash and looking desperately for places to stash it (no place more frantic than Colorado where legal marijuana growers can’t access the banking system).

So what’s an investor to do? It’s usually best to hunker down and not panic. And if you feel like panicking, turn off the TV and the Internet and take a walk. You’ll feel better and in the long run, your portfolio will thank you.

Share

Bashing Index Funds

By Larry Luxenberg  

Index Funds have attained a near untouchable status among the financial press and investors. And for good reason. The funds — at least the highly diversified ones — are regularly among the top long-term investments. Recently, a Bloomberg article took an opposite tack, bashing index funds for being mindless machines that let nimble investors exploit their announced intentions. The article is harsh but accurate. Index funds are predictable and not perfect investments but they do serve many investors well. There are approaches that take the index funds as a useful starting point, attempt to preserve what’s good and enhance returns by avoiding some of the index fund flaws. Trading is one significant area. Index funds buy and sell holding whenever an index changes essentially letting the marketplace know what you are going to trade before you do it. A more patient approach to trading can lead to significant gains. For the rest of the gory details, here’s the link to “Can you really game index funds?” http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-07-07/can-you-really-game-index-funds-

Share

Bond Bubble

By Larry Luxenberg  

If there were a bond bubble, this is what it would look like: trillions of dollars of Eurobonds going for negative interest rates, the 10 year German bund yielding pennies and Mexico promising to pay back bonds in 100 years with an interest rate of 4 percent. More than half of the world’s government bonds are yielding less than one percent. We don’t have any experience with this kind of a world. We know it won’t last forever but we don’t know when and how it will end. We do know that we should be careful in buying bonds. None of this means that we shouldn’t buy bonds or that everyone will lose money. A good guess is that many, if not most, of these bond buyers haven’t thought through the end game and if trouble comes, it will be unexpected. There are many reasons why interest rates are so low. One is that the Great Recession was so terrifying that people still haven’t recovered. They aren’t willing to sign up for risky assets and as a consequence they have made a once safe asset one of the riskiest. As the saying goes, buyer beware.

Share

A Disciplined Approach to Investing

By Larry Luxenberg  

Like Mining Low Grade Ore

 
Most investors look for a big strike, a huge vein of ore. It’s always possible that they will find it but the odds are heavily against them.

Successful investing is more like mining for low grade ore. It’s a less exciting, methodical process that takes a long time. But with careful attention to strategy and execution, the probability of success is much higher.

Working with low grade ore isn’t as exciting and you’ll never have one of those “Eureka” moments. But neither do you have the frustration of one barren mine after another.

Investors look for the magic stock or the magic fund, a lottery ticket, that will bring them quick riches. In practice what works is a long-term, diversified portfolio with careful attention to minimizing taxes, watching costs and removing emotion from the process.

Those who react to the latest news or are constantly on the lookout for a winner fly in the face of decades of market history. While there is a logic and temptation to that approach, nearly all academic literature belies this notion.

Once in a blue moon, investment lightning strikes. Do you want to put your future on the line with those odds?

Share

Dow Jones Changes

By Larry Luxenberg  

Apple Goes Into Dow

This week Apple Computer becomes part of the prestigious Dow Jones Industrial Average. The Dow is made up of 30 stocks and since its creation in 1896 has become the single most widely cited indicator of stock market performance. And yet its quirky structure shows the dangers of relying on any one indicator to mark investment performance. The Dow Jones average is based on just price, not the total value of the companies. Once a stock splits, its weight in the Dow goes down even though the value stays the same. After some moves in the Dow this week Goldman Sachs will have the heaviest weight in the average because it has the highest price. Moves in the price of Goldman stock will have a disproportionate affect on the average. Often the Dow moves in sync with other major averages such as the S&P 500 but many times they have widely divergent moves. While the Dow is a good shorthand way of following the stock market, keep in mind that its only a snapshot of a small number of stocks and there are thousands of other great companies.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-03-19/never-mind-apple-it-s-the-goldman-sachs-era-in-dow-industrials

Share